Articles via Databases
Articles via Journals
Online Catalog
E-books
Research & Information Literacy
Interlibrary loan
Theses & Dissertations
Collections
Policies
Services
About / Contact Us
Administration
Littman Architecture Library
This site will be removed in January 2019, please change your bookmarks.
This page will redirect to https://digitalcommons.njit.edu/theses/2398/ in 5 seconds

The New Jersey Institute of Technology's
Electronic Theses & Dissertations Project

Title: A comparative analysis of multicomponent distillation minimum reflux methods
Author: Loozen, Joesph H. F.
View Online: njit-etd1970-025
(x, 105 pages ~ 4.2 MB pdf)
Department: Department of Chemical Engineering and Chemistry
Degree: Master of Science
Program: Chemical Engineering
Document Type: Thesis
Advisory Committee: Roche, Edward Charles, Jr. (Committee chair)
McCormick, John E. (Committee member)
Hanesian, Deran (Committee member)
Date: 1970-05
Keywords: Distillation
Availability: Unrestricted
Abstract:

One of the most important factors to know in the design of distillation columns is the minimum reflux ratio. Numerous procedures have been developed for the determination of the value of the minimum reflux ratio for multicomponent mixtures requiring various degrees of computational effort. Shortcut techniques are obviously advantageous with respect to computation time. After reviewing the available methods, those by Underwood, Colburn, Scheibel and Montross, Murdoch and Holland, and Shiras et al. were selected for further evaluation, mainly on the basis of practical potential.

Comparison of these procedures was accomplished by calculating the minimum reflux ratio for a large number of systems with widely varying conditions. Considerable differences were found between the results of these methods; the spread between the lowest and highest value varying from less than 10% for a 4-component system with adjacent keys to over 100% for an 8-component mixture with one split key. It was established that these deviations stem mainly from differences in the relative volatilities.

The reliability and usefulness of the methods investigated would have to be determined by comparison of the results with those from a rigorous calculation. For general application, only the techniques by Underwood and Shiras et al. can be considered since they contain a feature for determining the product composition. Scheibel and Montross' procedure is the only one which can be used to carry out a hand calculation within a reasonable length of time.


If you have any questions please contact the ETD Team, libetd@njit.edu.

 
ETD Information
Digital Commons @ NJIT
Theses and DIssertations
ETD Policies & Procedures
ETD FAQ's
ETD home

Request a Scan
NDLTD

NJIT's ETD project was given an ACRL/NJ Technology Innovation Honorable Mention Award in spring 2003