Articles via Databases
Articles via Journals
Online Catalog
E-books
Research & Information Literacy
Interlibrary loan
Theses & Dissertations
Collections
Policies
Services
About / Contact Us
Administration
Littman Architecture Library
This site will be removed in January 2019, please change your bookmarks.
This page will redirect to https://digitalcommons.njit.edu/theses/428 in 5 seconds

The New Jersey Institute of Technology's
Electronic Theses & Dissertations Project

Title: Presentation type, perceived credibility, and perceived validity : a document usability analysis
Author: Langkamer-Smith, Jason
View Online: njit-etd2006-058
(x, 43 pages ~ 3.0 MB pdf)
Department: Department of Humanities
Degree: Master of Science
Program: Professional and Technical Communication
Document Type: Thesis
Advisory Committee: Elliot, Norbert (Committee chair)
Steffen-Fluhr, Nancy (Committee member)
Beaton, W. Patrick (Committee member)
Date: 2006-01
Keywords: Document usability analysis
Availability: Unrestricted
Abstract:

This descriptive research investigated usability measures reported by subjects who reviewed procedures formatted as decision tables and numbered lists taken from a microchip product specification document. The research subjects (n = 15) are employees of Agere Systems (headquartered in Allentown Pennsylvania, United States) where this researcher also worked as a technical writer. Subjects represented various national origins and were stratified into two groups of six Eastern and nine Western.

The independent variables, presentation type, perceived credibility, and perceived validity were studied for their interaction with the dependent variable, usability. The variable model was queried between the two groups. Three findings included the following:

1. Subjects from Western cultures reported higher scores for perceived credibility and perceived validity when reviewing procedures formatted as tables than those formatted as numbered lists (t = 2.226, p = 0.027).

2. Subjects from Eastern cultures reported higher scores than subjects from Western cultures on measures of perceived credibility when reviewing procedures formatted as both tables and numbered lists (t = 2.822, p = 0.005).

3. Subjects from Eastern cultures reported lower scores than subjects from Western cultures on measures of perceived validity when reviewing procedures formatted as both tables and numbered lists (t = -2.120, p = 0.035).

These are preliminary findings; the research was an exploratory effort to derive testable hypotheses for a future study designed to enroll larger populations under more strictly controlled experimental settings.


If you have any questions please contact the ETD Team, libetd@njit.edu.

 
ETD Information
Digital Commons @ NJIT
Theses and DIssertations
ETD Policies & Procedures
ETD FAQ's
ETD home

Request a Scan
NDLTD

NJIT's ETD project was given an ACRL/NJ Technology Innovation Honorable Mention Award in spring 2003