Declaration
of
Interdependence

Draft

When in the course of human events, the transformation of civilization demands rapid change, and threatens the way of life we have become accustomed to, it is necessary that we reengineer our society to insure that the values we hold dear are not destroyed by our inability to face change. Alvin Toffler's, 1994, Creating a new Civilization, has received bipartisan support at the highest levels, (Al, Newt),.as a visionary statement of the challenges facing humanity. Toffler calls for a reinvention of government from the ground up to meet the challenges of the information age. We have gone from dependence to independance and now face the challenge of attaining interdependence on the information super highway. We have transended the call to arms and now face the call to empowering the individual to fruitfully participate in the collaboration we call government.

We the Life Organism, divided from an original cell hold these principles to be self evident:

Therefore, every organism has a right to its share of our planets resources, and the right to live the good life in its own way.

To, secure these rights, goverenments are instituted securing their powers from the consent of the governed so long as they uphold these principles. Unbridled freedom, degenerates to anarchy, and there is no freedom in anarchy[?], yet Law restrains freedom, thus limiting diversity. Law cannot be entered into lightly, it is all to easy for government to become the problem rather than the solution unless law is based on sound principles with proven impacts on the quality of life in the current economic and social environment. Law must be free of cultural or moral predjustice and restrict individual freedom only to the extent which is absolutely necessary to protect the rights of others.

Prudence dictates that governments long established are not changed for light and transient causes; indeed, experience has shown that humankind is more disposed to suffer, while evils are sufferable, than to correct the situation by abolishing the forms they are accostomed to. But when the warning signs are clear, and the political machinery of the industrial age is doomed to failure in the information age, we have no option but to redesign government to meet the chalenges of the future. To prove this, let facts be presented to a candid world.

When our forefathers created democratic society, the common man represented a majority. Today we are all minorities. We are minorities in cultural heritage, in industry or service, in religion, in political philosophy, in our capabilities and handicapps. The challenge of todays government goes far beyond a simple majority rule and balance of power to protect our personal views of the good life.

Today's citizen lacks firm geographical ties. Geographical decentralization alone no longer protect the right of the individual as it once did. And there is no longer a frontier for the oppresed to escape to.

Group decisions are notoriously bad. Pure democracy degenerates to mob rule. Without a clear majority viewpoint democracy cannot lead to coordinated collective direction or vision. Advanced group decision support based on our shared principles with objective criteria must replace our outmoded political power struggles. Non-partisan win-win collaboration must replace destructive win-lose politics.

Our philosopy of funding government, taxation, dates back to the agricultural age, with minor modifications to accomidate the industrial age. By their very nature taxes stifle the economy. What we tax, is directly discouraged in the economy. Given the chaotic nature of economic systems it is folly to tax the positive indicators of our economy, income and sales. Pertubing the positive indicators in that way can only lead to downturns and wild fluctuation. It is wrong and must be stopped. If we must tax, we are responsible to tax those things we collectively must discourage. When possible, tax rather than criminal law should be applied where we find it necessary to limit the freedom of invidiuals. Taxing the depleation of our shared resources can not only fund government, it can also fund resource reclaimation and cleanup. We cannot depend on volunteerism to sustain our planet. Taxing scarce or dirty resources will encourage the development of plentiful clean alternative resources. The current incentives are to produce as much garbage as possible. We can make producing lasting value a prority, and improve the quality of life.

Government spending is out of control. Most nations face a massive deficits. Streamlining government, and disassembling the huge beuocracy in favor of competative specialized private management and service organizations just as the large corporations are being compelled to do by market factors, will certainly help. But much more is needed. We must completly rethink how we conduct the business of government. Government, after all, is simply the collaboration of individuals based on common principles to manage and protect their common resources. Surely we should manage our shared resources profitably. Government certainly should not be constrained to maximise short term profits as business often is. Government can affort a payoff in 10, 20, 50, or 100 years. And yet, government must be responsible for returning every penny of value as an invetment in our future. Government already earns billions in the international money market while stabalizing our currency on the world market. We must eliminate the taboo against government operating profitably. At the same time, government has no place in any business where the free market is working with at least three competitors. This does not mean government cannot remain a minority shareholder in businesses it helped spawn or salvage. We should recieve the full return on our investments whether they are collective or individual. Government should strive to be self funded. Every program should be audited regularly on its ability to return the value invested and provide for its own funding where possible. If government continues to increasingly suck the gravy from the economy we will soon find the plate empty.

No reasonable being would choose death over life, darkness over light, distruction over creation, or evil over good. The intent of our justise system has been to ellicit revenge against criminals. Although this may appease the certain individuals, it does not address the problems of antisocial behavior. Law is to protect our rights, and the first priority of justise must be to protect us from criminals. Additionally, repayment of damages should be a major priority. Compatable to this end, justice should strive to allow society to reap the maximum value the individual can produce while providing protection to the public. Education and treatment may be effective in preventing or curing antisocial behavior. We can also attack the economic and social conditions associated with crime. Crime is an indicator of our social heath as a civilization. If we can only deal with the problem with anger, and not with love and understanding or objective solutions to the problems of crime, perhaps we are part of the problem. We need to admit that our judgments are all too often wrong, and punishing the innocent is a crime. Let's stop punishing and start protecting and correcting.

Everybody makes mistakes. We need to start judging people on the bases of their successes rather than their failures. We must judge only what a person does, not what they haven't done. We cannot control what other people do and expect to be free. At the same time we are responsible for the choices we make and the chances we take. Law suit amounts must be restricted to direct costs, except where malice is apparent. We must transend this suit happy society to maximize our options as individuals. Outragous insurance costs greatly limit our possibilities for enterpise. We must unlease the enterprise potential of our individuals.

The emergance of the information age demands that individuals are granted absolute ownership and privacy of their personal information.

Solving the problems facing humanity is a tremendus challenge and opportunity. The emergence of the information age is a catalist for rapid change, in a new international economy where the capabilities of individuals and teams replaces the capital investment of the industrial age as the fuel to produce value. Transportation made the industrial age world small. Communcation in the information age has made it miniscule. Information age tools will allow us to capitalize on individual human resources rather then cookie cutter industrial age workers. Free enterprise is changing, it's ties to traditional capital and mass production are on the decline. Quality, customer service and empowering employees are the hallmarks of the successful information age company. Smaller specialized companies are thriving while the old big corporations are struggling to adjust to the new economy. Government, too, must adjust, or at least get out of the way, to allow the economy to sustain growth, and trive on change rather than be defeated by it. We can apply the priciples of continuous improvement and concurrant engineering to creating a less oppressive, kinder, gentler, and more effective government in the new information age civilization.

Any unemployed person, in a free enterprise society, is a wasted resource. The value they might create is lost, along with the potential profit, as is the market they would represent if they were gainfully employed. Generally, we are not spending too much mony on the welfare of our people, we are just misspending it. We do not have too many people, we are simply misusing our resources. We deplete our scarse resources until economic crises results and allow our abundant resources to go fallow. The information age can help us make profitable appropriate use of all our resourses if we accept change and allow our individuals to thrive. We all have a direct stake in the social and economic consequences of the transformation to the information age. If we sustain industrial age thinking and government, we will indeed face a painfull transformation of economic hardship, loss of liberty, destruction of our environment, and international strife.

We, therefore, representatives of the life organism, declare our interpedendence, and solomly vow to support one anothers view of the good life with our lives, our fortune, and our sacred honor.