Articles via Databases
Articles via Journals
Online Catalog
E-books
Research & Information Literacy
Interlibrary loan
Theses & Dissertations
Collections
Policies
Services
About / Contact Us
Administration
Littman Architecture Library
This site will be removed in January 2019, please change your bookmarks.
This page will redirect to https://digitalcommons.njit.edu/theses/454 in 5 seconds

The New Jersey Institute of Technology's
Electronic Theses & Dissertations Project

Title: Do industrial back support belts reduce stress in asymmetric lifting?
Author: Brown, Ryan Jamor
View Online: njit-etd2006-121
(x, 55 pages ~ 3.2 MB pdf)
Department: Department of Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering
Degree: Master of Science
Program: Occupational Safety and Health Engineering
Document Type: Thesis
Advisory Committee: Sengupta, Arijit K. (Committee chair)
Abdou, George Hanna (Committee member)
Blanchard, Harry Edward (Committee member)
Date: 2006-01
Keywords: Back support belt
Asymmetric lifting
Availability: Unrestricted
Abstract:

The objective of this research is to determine the effects of wearing a back support belt during repetitive asymmetric lifting in terms of heart rate, blood pressure, static lift capacity, body discomfort rating and subjective rating concerning the effectiveness of a back support belt. The type of belt used in this study was of knit nylon and elastic construction designed for industrial use.

Eight female participants lifted a crate from the table to knuckle height at a rate of three lifts per minute for a period of 20 minutes; one set with wearing back support belt and one without back support belt. The weight of the box was then adjusted to participants’ maximum acceptable weight of lift, which range between 9kg to 10kg. The overall average heart rate (HR) was reduced from 96.2 beats per minute (bpm) to 90.9 bpm when back support belt was worn, and the reduction was statistically significant (P<0.05). Average systolic and diastolic blood pressure reduced from 114/71 to 106/64 with back support belt, but reduction wasn’t statistically significant. Body discomfort ratings and static lift capacity did not register any systematic or significant change. Subjective ratings strongly favored wearing of back support belt. Results supported the effectiveness of back support belts in reducing physiological stresses, possibly by increasing the structural support at the lower back and thereby reducing muscular activity in the lower back area.


If you have any questions please contact the ETD Team, libetd@njit.edu.

 
ETD Information
Digital Commons @ NJIT
Theses and DIssertations
ETD Policies & Procedures
ETD FAQ's
ETD home

Request a Scan
NDLTD

NJIT's ETD project was given an ACRL/NJ Technology Innovation Honorable Mention Award in spring 2003